Xí Muội's essay - Moving forward
Jessica Hoang
Ms. Duran
English11 Honors
22 March 2016
Moving
forward
For hundreds of years, the government has been adding,
changing, and removing laws numerous times. However, the process of changing
the law is not quick nor is it easy. Most of the time, change requires endless
efforts of raising awareness to gain support, proposing bills, petitioning, and
many more. Martin Luther King Junior was a transcendentalist who promotes the
idea of large scale protest resistance to unjust laws in his “Letter from
Birmingham Jail.” In his writing, he touched on the subject regarding the
importance of one’s moral responsibility by standing up for the rights that
they are entitled to when those rights are violated. The awareness that the
Civil Rights Movement desperately needed at the moment was brought by Dr.
King’s responding letter. Despite the fact that society is moving in the right
direction with the issue of racial inequalities, it is moving backwards with
the issue of abortion rights. The law legalizing in 1973 sparked the start of
many organizations forming with the purpose of giving everyone a place to
testify the beauty of life and the dignity of everyone. The march for life is
one of those organizations. The march embodies Dr. King’s idea by bringing
together people, who genuinely want change, to protest against the unjust law
of violating a person’s right to live.
The case of Roe v. Wade in 1973 was the case that ruled a
state law that banned abortions unconstitutional, except in a situation where
the mother’s life is endangered by the child. Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington
were two recent graduates from the University of Texas Law School, who brought
a lawsuit on behalf of Jane Doe, a pregnant woman who resides in Dallas,
claiming that the Texas law that criminalizes most abortions violated Jane
Roe’s rights. The lawsuit was against Dallas Country District Attorney, Henry
Wade. In a recent article published by the Public
Broadcasting Service, Alex
McBride, a third year law student, writes that Roe claimed that her life was
not endangered but she could not afford to move out of state and had the right
of aborting her pregnancy in a safe and secure medical environment. The Texas
court ruled the law unconstitutional. Disagreeing with the court, Wade appealed
to the US Supreme Court, which reviewed the case from 1971 to 1972. The Roe v.
Wade companion case, Doe v. Bolton also prompted the start of the controversial
debate regarding abortion rights. The
author of the article Doe v. Bolton talks about how in this case, the Supreme
Court elaborated on the health exceptions that was established in Roe. The
Court ruled that the doctor’s medical judgement of the mother’s health may be
exercised in the light of all factors including physical, emotional, familial,
the women’s age and psychological.
Comments
Post a Comment